Quick answer
Answer every comment in a point-by-point letter: quote the comment, state what you changed, and quote the revised text with page and line numbers. Where you disagree, justify with evidence and offer a compromise such as an added limitation. Never argue about tone, and never write 'as we already stated'.
Key takeaways
- Read the decision letter, then wait two days before replying.
- Split each reviewer paragraph into separate comments; they usually contain several.
- A misunderstanding means your text was unclear — fix the paper, not just the letter.
- Quote your revised text rather than describing it.
- Major revision is a good outcome; most such papers are eventually accepted.
First, read and wait
Read the decision letter once, then leave it for two days. Reviewer language can read harshly even when the substance is fair. When you return to it, you will see requests rather than attacks.
Build a response table
Copy every comment into a table, split into individual points, and add columns for your action, your response and the page or line where the change appears. A reviewer's single paragraph often contains three separate requests; answer all three.
Sort every comment into one of four types
| Type | Response |
|---|---|
| Easy fix | Make the change, quote the new text |
| Substantive but doable | Do the extra analysis or reading, then show the result |
| Misunderstanding | Clarify in the paper first, then explain in the letter |
| Genuine disagreement | Justify with evidence, and offer a compromise |
A misunderstanding is almost always a signal that your text was unclear. Fix the text, do not just explain yourself in the letter.
The structure of a response letter
- A short covering paragraph thanking the editor and reviewers and stating that all comments have been addressed.
- Each comment quoted in full, in the reviewer's own words.
- Your response immediately after it.
- The revised text quoted, with page and line numbers.
Use formatting to separate comments from responses — bold for the comment, plain for the response — so an editor can scan it in two minutes.
Example wording
Accepting a comment: "Thank you for this observation. We agree that the sampling procedure was not described in sufficient detail. We have expanded Section 3.2 (page 8, lines 12–24) to state the sampling frame, the inclusion criteria and the response rate."
Disagreeing politely: "We appreciate this suggestion. We considered adding a longitudinal component, but the present study was designed to test a cross-sectional model, and the data were collected in a single wave. To address the underlying concern, we have added a limitation (page 19, lines 4–9) and recommended a longitudinal replication. We would be glad to reconsider if the editor prefers."
Handling a misunderstanding: "This comment suggests our description of the mediation test was unclear, and we thank the reviewer for pointing it out. We did use bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples; this was stated only in the table note. We have now made it explicit in Section 4.3 (page 13, lines 6–10)."
Rules that keep editors on your side
- Answer every comment, even the ones you consider trivial.
- Never argue about tone, and never write "as we already stated".
- Quote your revised text rather than describing it.
- Submit the revision within the deadline, or ask for an extension before it passes.
- Include a clean copy and a tracked-changes copy if the journal asks for both.
Reviewers are unpaid colleagues reading your work closely. A response letter that takes them seriously is the single cheapest way to improve your odds of acceptance.
What slows revisions down
- Starting with the hardest comment. Clear the easy fixes first; momentum matters when a revision spans weeks.
- Re-running analysis without a plan. Decide exactly which extra tests a comment requires before opening your data.
- Silence towards the editor. If you need longer, ask before the deadline; extensions are routine.
- Treating review as an attack. Reviewers are unpaid colleagues reading your work closely, and their comments are the cheapest peer feedback you will ever get.
Keeping the paper moving after acceptance
Once accepted, check the proofs carefully — author names, affiliations, funding statements, table numbering and figure quality — because corrections after publication require a formal erratum. Record the DOI, the issue details and dated evidence of the journal's index status for your university file. Our guide to publishing your first Scopus paper covers the full path, and the journal selection guide covers where to send the next one.
Frequently asked questions
Does major revision mean a PhD scholar's paper will be rejected?
No. For a PhD scholar, major revision means the editor sees potential. A large share of papers that reach major revision are eventually accepted, provided the response letter addresses every comment properly.
Can a PhD researcher disagree with a reviewer?
Yes, if you justify it with evidence and stay courteous. Explain your reasoning, cite support, and offer a compromise such as adding a limitation or an alternative analysis.
How long should a PhD scholar take to revise a paper?
A PhD scholar should follow the journal's stated deadline, usually 30 to 90 days. If you need longer, email the editor before the deadline passes and ask for an extension.
How many reviewer comments should a research scholar respond to?
All of them, including ones you consider minor or mistaken. An unanswered comment is the most common reason a revision is returned for a second round.
What if two reviewers contradict each other?
Say so politely, explain which position you followed and why, and ask the editor to arbitrate. Editors expect this and it is not held against you.
Should a PhD scholar send the revised paper with tracked changes?
Follow the journal's instructions. Many ask for both a clean file and a tracked-changes file, plus the response letter as a separate document.
Need a mentor for this stage?
ScholarLabz mentors PhD scholars 1-on-1 — topic, methodology, analysis, writing and publication. Free research assessment, reply within 24 hours.
Get Expert Guidance